Skip to content

stateless

Last updated: 2026-06-15 22:10 ยท same-machine, relative comparison.

Throughput / resource usage

product version offered_in/s consumed_in/s output_rate cpu_avg cpu_p95 rss_avg_mb rss_max_mb window run
turbine 0.1.0a4 750,000 462,645 149,115 106.4 110.0 1,066.9 1,182.2 60 2026-06-15 22:10
quix 3.23.6 - 188,295 60,080 100.8 103.0 211.6 214.6 60 2026-06-14 18:42

Analysis (turbine = baseline):

  • output_rate: ๐Ÿ† turbine โ€” quix 0.40ร— vs turbine
  • cpu_avg (lower better): ๐Ÿ† quix โ€” quix 0.95ร— vs turbine
  • rss_avg_mb (lower better): ๐Ÿ† quix โ€” quix 0.20ร— vs turbine

Sanity โ€” are we benching the same thing?

product selectivity (out/in) expected breach_rate enrichment sample
turbine 0.1790 0.3100 0.196 โœ“ 500
quix 0.3037 - 0.178 โœ“ 500

Verdict: โœ“ same order of magnitude (selectivity & breach_rate within 2ร— across products).